Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 10 |
| 2013-09-25 | 2020-09-11 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 386 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 is better than the Galaxy Note3, getting an 87.7 score against 77.7. Both devices in this review use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy M51 has older 10 version while Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2 version. The Galaxy M51 construction is incredibly newer, but noticeably heavier and thicker than the Galaxy Note3.
The Galaxy M51 features a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a greater number of cores (although they are slower) and 3 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy M51 counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy Note3, because although it has a quite lower display pixel density, it also counts with a bigger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340.
Galaxy M51 features a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy M51 also has a camera with a way better 64 mega pixels resolution, a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light captures and a lot bigger sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photographs.
The Galaxy M51 features a very superior memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.