Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2013-09-25 | 2019-03-08 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 has a general score of 88.3, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy Note3's 77.7 general score. Samsung Galaxy S10 is a noticeably newer phone, and it is also just a little thinner and just a little bit lighter than Samsung Galaxy Note3. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S10 has the previous 11 version and Samsung Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2.
Samsung Galaxy S10 features a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has more RAM memory and 4 more CPU cores. Galaxy S10 counts with a better looking display than Galaxy Note3, because it has a better pixels density, a way higher 1440 x 3040 resolution and a bit larger display.
Galaxy S10 counts with a much better storage for games and applications than Galaxy Note3, because it has 128 GB internal memory and an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy S10 has just a bit better camera than Galaxy Note3, because although it has a worse resolution camera in the back and a worse 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a lot larger diafragm aperture to take better low light captures and video and a bigger camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
The Galaxy S10 has a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note3, because it has a 3400mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.