Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2013-09-25 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 has a score of 94.8, which is much better than the Galaxy Note3's 77.7 global score. Samsung Galaxy S20's body is way newer, just a little thinner and a bit lighter than the Galaxy Note3. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S20 has an older 13 version while Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2.
Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy Note3, because it has a greater screen density, a bit bigger screen and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels. The Samsung Galaxy S20 features a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note3, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal storage.
The Galaxy S20 has just a bit better performance than Galaxy Note3, because it has 9 GB more RAM and a larger number of faster cores. Galaxy S20 features superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note3, because it has a 25% bigger battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy S20 features a much better camera than Galaxy Note3, because although it has a lower resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a way better video quality, a bigger camera aperture and a much larger back camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.