Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2013-09-25 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a global score of 98, which is way better than Samsung Galaxy Note3's 77.7 general score. Although the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much newer than the Samsung Galaxy Note3, it is a little bit thicker and notably heavier. These phones have Android operating system, but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has older 13 version while Samsung Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a way better 1440 x 3200 resolution, a larger screen and a higher pixels quantity per inch of display. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has more RAM and a higher number of cores.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has much more storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note3, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1000 GB and more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note3, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3200mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots much better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note3, because it has a way bigger sensor providing a way higher image quality, a lot higher video definition, a back camera with a much better 108 megapixels resolution and a bigger aperture to capture better photography and video in poorly lited environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.