Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2013-09-25 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is way better than Galaxy Note3, having a general score of 95.4 against 77.7. Even though Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is notably newer than Galaxy Note3, it's extremely heavier and a bit thicker. Both phones we are comparing come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has the older 13 version while Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2 version.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a higher number of cores (and also faster) and a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a larger display, a better amount of pixels per screen inch and a lot higher 1440 x 3088 resolution.
Galaxy S22 Ultra takes much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy Note3, because it has a much better 7680x4320 video quality, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way higher image quality, a lot better resolution back camera and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photography.
Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with just a bit bigger storage to install games and applications than Galaxy Note3, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a superior battery duration than Galaxy Note3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.