Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 14 |
| 2013-09-25 | -- |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 5.93 ounces | -- |
| Black, Pink and White | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 has a score of 82.6, which is slightly better than the Galaxy Note3's overall score of 77.7. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S25 has 14 version while Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2 version. Galaxy S25 is a notably lighter and way thinner phone than the Galaxy Note3.
Galaxy S25 features a much sharper screen than Galaxy Note3, because it has a bit better display pixel density, a little bit larger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution. Samsung Galaxy Note3 counts with a very superior hardware performance than Galaxy S25, although it has an inferior number of cores and lesser RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S25 captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy Note3, because it has a much better 7680x4320 video definition, a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light captures, a way bigger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a way more mega pixels camera in the back.
The Galaxy S25 counts with just a bit more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy S25 has longer battery performance than Galaxy Note3, because it has a 25 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.