Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2013-09-25 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 386 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a bit better than the Galaxy Note3, having a global score of 80.1 against 77.7. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's body is noticeably newer, but noticeably heavier and way thicker than the Galaxy Note3. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has the newer 8.0 Oreo version and Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2, giving some nice extra features and performance optimizations.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy Note3, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and more cpu cores. Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per display inch.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note3, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a very superior battery duration than Galaxy Note3, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Samsung Galaxy Note3 takes better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor giving a worse image quality and a much tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light photos and video, it also counts with a much better video definition and a more mega pixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.