Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2013-09-25 | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is much better than the Samsung Galaxy Note3, having a global score of 88.5 against 77.7. Galaxy Z Flip is a noticeably newer and somewhat thinner cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy Note3, but it is also a little bit heavier. These devices come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Flip has older 12 version and Samsung Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2 version.
The Galaxy Z Flip has a slightly better looking display than Galaxy Note3, because it has a little greater screen density, a larger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy Note3, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores (and faster).
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a lot bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy Note3, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy Z Flip captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note3, because although it has a camera in the back with a lower resolution and a lower 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a bigger aperture for better photos in low light environments.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features just a little better battery life than Galaxy Note3, because it has a 3 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.