Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 10 |
| 2013-09-25 | 2020-05-08 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Blasting black |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has an overall score of 90.1, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy Note3's 77.7 general score. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro body is extremely newer than Samsung Galaxy Note3's, but it is thicker and extremely heavier. Both devices we are comparing have Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has the previous 10 version while Samsung Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2 version.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a larger number of cores and a greater amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a little bit better display than Galaxy Note3, because it has a higher screen pixel density, a larger display and a way better 1440 x 3120 resolution.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note3, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a way better camera than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a camera with a lot higher 64 mega pixels resolution, a much larger sensor shooting lot better quality videos and photos, better 60 frames per second video frame rates and a bigger aperture to capture better captures and videos in low-light situations.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.