Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 10 |
| 2013-09-25 | 2020-10-13 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.57 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Atlantic blue, Pearl gray and Rose gold |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4820mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite has a general score of 81.2, which is a little bit better than Galaxy Note3's 77.7 score. These phones include Android OS, but the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite has 10 version while Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2 version. Although Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite is a lot newer than the Galaxy Note3, it is a little thicker and notably heavier.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite has just a little better performance than Galaxy Note3, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores. The Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy Note3, because it has a quite better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, a quite better display pixel density and a larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy Note3 has a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy Note3 also has a SD memory slot that allows up to 64 GB. Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite features a superior battery life than Galaxy Note3, because it has 4820mAh of battery capacity.
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite takes just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite also has a bigger camera aperture for better low light captures, a much more mega pixels camera in the back and a much larger camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.