Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2013-09-25 | 2018-04-03 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note3, getting an 83.8 score against 77.7. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s body is much newer and a little thinner, but somewhat heavier than the Samsung Galaxy Note3. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a little more vivid display than Galaxy Note3, because it has a just a bit better pixel density, a quite larger screen and a quite better 1080 x 2160 pixels resolution.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a greater number of cores and a higher amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because although it has a worse (4K) video definition and a lower 12 megapixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a larger aperture and a larger sensor providing a higher image quality. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a little better battery performance than Galaxy Note3, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.