Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 11 |
| 2013-09-25 | 2021-04-20 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 199.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 is a little bit better than Galaxy Note3, getting a general score of 78.3 against 77.7. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 is a just a little bit heavier cellphone than Galaxy Note3, but both are equally thin. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 has older 11 version and Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2 version.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 features a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has 4 more cpu cores (but slower) and a larger amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 features a better screen than Galaxy Note3, because it has a bit larger screen, a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a quite greater pixel density.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 features a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 has a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a lot larger camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photos, a larger camera aperture and a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.