Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2013-09-25 | 2019-01-15 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 has a score of 80.3, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note3's 77.7 overall score. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 design is newer and just a little bit thinner, but a bit heavier than Samsung Galaxy Note3. Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 features a bit better screen than Galaxy Note3, because it has a quite greater pixel amount per inch of display, a little bit bigger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 features a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 256 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 counts with a bit better CPU than Galaxy Note3, because it has a greater number of cores and more RAM.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 counts with improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 captures much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 also has higher 120 frames per second video frame rate, a lot better resolution back-facing camera, a larger diafragm aperture and a much bigger sensor taking lot better quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.