Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 10 |
| 2013-09-25 | 2020-05-20 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note3 is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, with a 77.7 score against 76.6. These devices work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Note3 has newer 4.4.2 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has Android 10. Samsung Galaxy Note3 is an extremely older phone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, but Samsung could make it somewhat lighter and a bit thinner.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have 3 GB of RAM memory, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has a higher number of cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy Note3, because it has a bit larger screen, a little higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite better number of pixels in each screen inch.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features a little bit more storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 128 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 shoots better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has a much bigger camera sensor, a larger camera aperture to take better low light images and video and a back facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.