Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 10 |
| 2013-09-25 | 2020-05-05 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy Note3, with a general score of 81.1 against 77.7. Both devices in this comparison review have Android operating system, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2 version. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a notably newer phone than the Samsung Galaxy Note3, but it's heavier and just a little bit thicker.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a larger screen, a little better pixels quantity per display inch and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has an external memory slot that allows up to 512 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy Note3, because it has 3 GB more RAM memory and a larger number of cores. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a way better camera than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a lot bigger sensor shooting lot better quality videos and pictures, a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution back camera and a larger camera aperture to take better low-light captures and videos.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a very superior battery life than Galaxy Note3, because it has a 5020mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.