Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2014-09-29 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP6 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy Note4, getting a general score of 80.2 against 77.6. Google Pixel is a incredibly newer and lighter cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy Note4, although it's also a little thicker. Galaxy Note4 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with 4 more cpu cores (although slower).
The Galaxy Note4 counts with just a bit better screen than Google Pixel, because it has a better 1440 x 2560 resolution, a just a little better pixels amount in each inch in the display and a bit bigger display. Google Pixel features a much bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note4, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy Note4 features greater battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has a 16% larger battery capacity. The Galaxy Note4 takes slightly better videos and photos than Google Pixel, because although it has a smaller sensor and a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for capturing photographs and/or video in low light environments, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy Note4 also counts with a way higher resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.