Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2014-09-29 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP6 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has a score of 80, which is just a bit better than Galaxy Note4's 77.6 global score. Google Pixel 3 is a newer phone, and it is also a little bit thinner and lighter than Galaxy Note4. Galaxy Note4 has a little sharper display than Google Pixel 3, because it has a just a little higher pixels number in each display inch, a little bit larger screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
Samsung Galaxy Note4 counts with a little bit more storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 128 GB. Google Pixel 3 counts with a bit superior processor than Galaxy Note4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 3 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Note4 counts with a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for taking photos or videos in low light environments and a tinier back-facing camera sensor taking lower quality images and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy Note4 also counts with a way better 16 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
The Galaxy Note4 has just a little better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 10 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.