Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2014-09-29 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP6 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a has a general score of 78.8, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy Note4's general score of 77.6. The Google Pixel 3a body is extremely newer, just a little thinner and lighter than Samsung Galaxy Note4. The Google Pixel 3a counts with a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note4, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Google Pixel 3a also has a greater amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Note4 has a little bit better looking display than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a bit more pixels per inch in the display, a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a bit larger display. Galaxy Note4 counts with slightly more storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 128 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy Note4 shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor capturing worse quality videos and images and a tinier camera aperture which is not good for shooting photos and videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy Note4 also counts with a camera in the back with much more mega pixels.
The Galaxy Note4 has a little better battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 3220mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.