Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2014-09-29 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Titan gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP6 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 has a general score of 85.4, which is much better than the Galaxy Note4's 77.6 general score. The LG K92 is a heavier cellphone than Galaxy Note4, but both are equally thin. The Samsung Galaxy Note4 counts with a little bit better looking display than LG K92, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution and a greater pixel density.
LG K92 counts with a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG K92 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. LG K92 counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note4, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the LG K92 also has a back-facing camera with a way better resolution, a lot bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a bigger aperture for better low light captures.
The LG K92 features a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Note4, because it has 128 GB internal memory and an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG K92 features longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note4, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.