Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2014-09-29 | 2020-05-07 |
| 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Mirror black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP6 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG Q70 is a little bit better than Galaxy Note4, with a 77.9 score against 77.6. LG Q70's body is notably newer and a little thinner, but heavier than Galaxy Note4. The LG Q70 features just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy Note4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG Q70 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Note4 features a slightly better looking display than LG Q70, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels number per display inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560. The LG Q70 counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor shooting lower quality photographs and videos, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the LG Q70 also counts with a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light images and videos and a camera with a way higher 32 megapixels resolution.
The LG Q70 has a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Note4, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal storage capacity. The LG Q70 counts with greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.