Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| 2014-09-29 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP6 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a score of 87.1, which is much better than the Galaxy Note4's general score of 77.6. The LG Velvet construction is much newer and a bit thinner, but also just a little bit heavier than the Galaxy Note4. The LG Velvet features a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Note4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG Velvet also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Note4 features a bit better looking display than LG Velvet, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels count in each inch of screen and a slightly higher 1440 x 2560px resolution. LG Velvet has a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and 96 GB more internal memory capacity.
The LG Velvet counts with a better camera than Galaxy Note4, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the LG Velvet also has a lot higher resolution back camera, a larger diafragm aperture and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a much higher image and video quality.
LG Velvet counts with greater battery performance than Galaxy Note4, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity against 3220mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.