Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2014-09-29 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP6 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a general score of 87.1, which is better than the Galaxy Note4's 77.6 score. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's design is notably newer, but heavier and a little thicker than the Galaxy Note4. The Samsung Galaxy Note4 has a really superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch in the display and a little worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a larger screen. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note4, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a way better battery performance than Galaxy Note4, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3220mAh. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures a lot better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note4, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rate, a lot bigger aperture for better low-light photography, a camera with a much higher resolution and a way larger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.