Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2014-09-29 | 2020-12-07 |
| 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPS |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP6 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G 5G is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note4, getting a overall score of 81.5 against 77.6. Even though the Motorola Moto G 5G is way newer than the Samsung Galaxy Note4, it is somewhat thicker and heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Note4 features a little more vivid screen than Moto G 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater pixel amount per inch of display.
The Moto G 5G features a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because it has more internal storage and a SD card slot that allows up to 1000 GB. Moto G 5G features a little faster processing unit than Galaxy Note4, and although they both have 8 cores, the Moto G 5G also has more RAM.
The Moto G 5G takes much better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note4, and although they both have the same video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Moto G 5G also has a much bigger camera aperture to take better images and video in low-light situations and a lot more mega-pixels back camera.
Moto G 5G has a superior battery performance than Galaxy Note4, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3220mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.