Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-09-29 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Smoke black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP6 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note4 is a little bit better than Motorola Moto G Power, with a overall score of 77.6 against 76.1. Samsung Galaxy Note4's design is somewhat lighter and thinner than the Motorola Moto G Power, despite of the fact that it was released 6 years before. Moto G Power features a bit better CPU than Galaxy Note4, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Moto G Power also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note4 features a little bit better screen than Moto G Power, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per inch of display. Moto G Power features just a bit better camera than Galaxy Note4, because although it has a smaller sensor capturing less light and washed colors, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, a same resolution back facing camera and the same video frame rate, the Moto G Power also counts with a lot bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light captures and video.
The Motorola Moto G Power features a way bigger memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because it has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB internal storage. Motorola Moto G Power has a much better battery performance than Galaxy Note4, because it has a 55% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.