Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2014-09-29 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP6 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G200 5G is better than Galaxy Note4, with an 86.2 score against 77.6. The Motorola Moto G200 5G construction is a lot newer, but just a little thicker and somewhat heavier than the Galaxy Note4. Moto G200 5G features a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy Note4, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Moto G200 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note4 counts with a little bit better looking screen than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1440 x 2560px resolution and more pixels per inch of screen. The Moto G200 5G has a much better storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Moto G200 5G shoots way better videos and photos than Galaxy Note4, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Moto G200 5G also has a larger aperture and a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels. The Moto G200 5G features a way better battery duration than Galaxy Note4, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.