Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2014-09-29 | -- |
| 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Iced Mint and Ink Blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP6 GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G60s is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note4, getting a 79.9 score against 77.6. Despite being the best in our current comparison, Motorola Moto G60s is a somewhat heavier and thicker cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy Note4. Galaxy Note4 counts with a slightly better screen than Motorola Moto G60s, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater display density and a slightly higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Moto G60s features a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because it has 96 GB more internal memory and an external memory slot that allows up to 1 TB. The Motorola Moto G60s has just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy Note4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Moto G60s also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Moto G60s shoots much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy Note4, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Moto G60s also has a camera with a much better resolution and a much bigger camera aperture to take better captures and video in poorly lited situations.
The Moto G60s counts with a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note4, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.