Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2014-09-29 | 2020-08-28 |
| 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Forest green and Sapphire blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP6 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note4 is a little bit better than Moto G9 Play, getting a score of 77.6 against 76.7. The Galaxy Note4 is an incredibly older cellphone than the Moto G9 Play, but Samsung managed to build it somewhat lighter and just a little thinner. Motorola Moto G9 Play counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Note4, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Motorola Moto G9 Play also has more RAM.
Galaxy Note4 counts with a sharper display than Moto G9 Play, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a much higher amount of pixels per inch of screen and a way higher 1440 x 2560px resolution. Motorola Moto G9 Play features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because it has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 32 GB more internal memory capacity.
Motorola Moto G9 Play features a much better battery performance than Galaxy Note4, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Moto G9 Play shoots much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy Note4, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video quality, the Moto G9 Play also has a lot bigger sensor providing a way higher image quality, higher video frame rate, a much more mega-pixels camera in the back and a way larger aperture for better low-light captures and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.