Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2014-09-29 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP6 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1, EDR | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note4 has a score of 77.6, which is just a bit better than Moto Z Force's 75.8 score. Although Galaxy Note4 is better than the Moto Z Force, we must highlight that it's also older, just a little bit heavier and thicker. Motorola Moto Z Force features a CPU that's very similar to the Galaxy Note4 one, because although the Motorola Moto Z Force has 4 lesser cpu cores , it also counts with more RAM.
The Moto Z Force and Galaxy Note4 feature incredibly similar displays, because although the Moto Z Force has a little smaller screen, and they both have an equal 1440 x 2560 resolution, it also counts with a quite better pixel density. Moto Z Force features a very superior storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because it has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal memory capacity.
The Moto Z Force has a little longer battery performance than Galaxy Note4, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3220mAh. Moto Z Force captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note4, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Moto Z Force also has a bigger aperture to capture better captures and videos in low light environments and a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.