Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2014-09-29 | 2016-07-28 |
| 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP6 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1, EDR | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note4 has a global score of 77.6, which is a bit better than Moto Z Force Droid Edition's 76.4 general score. Galaxy Note4 is an older, thicker and a little bit heavier device than Moto Z Force Droid Edition. The Galaxy Note4 and the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition have similar displays, because although the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition has a little smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1440 x 2560 resolution, it also counts with a just a little greater pixel density.
The Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a processing unit that is just as good as Galaxy Note4's processor, because although the Moto Z Force Droid Edition has 4 lesser cpu cores (although they are faster), it also counts with more RAM. The Moto Z Force Droid Edition has a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note4, because it has an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal storage capacity.
Moto Z Force Droid Edition features just a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity. Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a bit better camera than Galaxy Note4, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition also has a larger aperture to capture better photos in low-light situations and a back facing camera with lot more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.