Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2014-09-29 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP6 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note4 is a little bit better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, having a score of 77.6 against 77.4. Despite being the best in our current comparison, we must highlight that it's also older, thicker and heavier. Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy Note4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition also has more RAM memory.
Moto Z2 Force Edition has a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy Note4, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels, the Moto Z2 Force Edition also counts with a just a little higher pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy Note4 has just a bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy Note4 also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing higher quality photographs and videos and a way more MP back-facing camera.
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note4, because it has 64 GB internal memory and an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy Note4 has better battery duration than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 3220mAh battery size against 2730mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.