Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2014-09-29 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP6 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note4 is a little bit better than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, getting a 77.6 score against 77.4. Despite being the best phone in this comparison, it must be told that it is also a incredibly older, noticeably thicker and somewhat heavier phone. The Galaxy Note4 features a slightly better looking screen than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a better 1440 x 2560px resolution, a little bit bigger screen and more pixels per inch in the display.
Moto Z2 Play counts with much more storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note4, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. Moto Z2 Play has a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note4, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Moto Z2 Play also has 1 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Note4 shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a way tinier camera aperture which is not nice for shooting images or videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy Note4 also counts with a camera in the back with a way higher resolution.
Galaxy Note4 counts with a bit longer battery performance than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 7% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.