Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2014-09-29 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP6 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note4 is just a bit better than Moto Z3, getting a 77.6 score against 77.6. Samsung Galaxy Note4's construction is extremely older, thicker and somewhat heavier than the Moto Z3. The Samsung Galaxy Note4 has a bit more vivid screen than Moto Z3, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher pixels quantity in each display inch.
Moto Z3 counts with a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy Note4, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Moto Z3 also has more RAM. The Moto Z3 features a much bigger storage to install games and applications than Galaxy Note4, because it has an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB and more internal storage.
The Galaxy Note4 counts with just a bit longer battery lifetime than Moto Z3, because it has a 3220mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh. Samsung Galaxy Note4 shoots slightly better videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z3, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy Note4 also counts with a bigger camera sensor and a back facing camera with a way higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.