Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2014-09-29 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP6 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note4 is slightly better than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, with a 77.6 score against 76.3. Despite being the best we are comparing here, Samsung Galaxy Note4's construction is much older, somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than Motorola Moto Z3 Play. Samsung Galaxy Note4 has a little sharper display than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher number of pixels per inch in the display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560.
Samsung Galaxy Note4 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Moto Z3 Play, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Moto Z3 Play features a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy Note4 features a slightly better camera than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a much smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for capturing photographs or video in low light situations and a smaller camera sensor shooting worse quality videos and photographs, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy Note4 also counts with a lot more MP back-facing camera.
Galaxy Note4 counts with a bit better battery performance than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 7% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.