Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 15 |
| 2014-09-29 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | -- |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 515 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP6 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy Note4, with a 79.2 score against 77.6. Although the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is heavier than Samsung Galaxy Note4, it's way thinner and way newer. The Samsung Galaxy Note4 counts with a way better processing power than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has 13 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Samsung Galaxy Note4 features a lot better looking screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a quite smaller display. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy Note4, because it has a way better 7680x4320 video quality, a lot more mega pixels back facing camera and a larger aperture.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy Note4, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 480 GB more internal storage. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a really longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.