Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2014-09-29 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP6 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A35 5G has a global score of 79.4, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note4's score of 77.6. The Galaxy A35 5G body is a lot newer and just a little thinner than the Samsung Galaxy Note4's, although it is also somewhat heavier. Samsung Galaxy Note4 has a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features a superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy Note4 counts with a very superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy A35 5G captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy Note4, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A35 5G also has a way larger sensor, a way more mega pixels back-facing camera and a larger diafragm aperture. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.