Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2014-09-29 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP6 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is a bit better than Galaxy Note4, getting a general score of 83.8 against 77.6. Galaxy A50 is a notably newer phone, and it is also a bit lighter and a little bit thinner than the Galaxy Note4. The Samsung Galaxy Note4 features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A50, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy Note4, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has 1 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a much bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note4, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy A50 shoots just a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy Note4, because although it has a tinier camera sensor shooting worse quality videos and photographs, and they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A50 also counts with a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels and a much bigger aperture to capture better captures and video in low light environments.
Galaxy A50 features greater battery life than Galaxy Note4, because it has a 24 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.