Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2014-09-29 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP6 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is much better than the Galaxy Note4, getting a overall score of 90.7 against 77.6. The Galaxy A52 design has the same thickness than the Galaxy Note4, but it is just a bit heavier. Samsung Galaxy A52 has a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note4, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Note4 has just a bit better screen than Galaxy A52, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a higher pixel density. The Galaxy A52 has a superior storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because it has 96 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy A52 features a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note4, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A52 also has a way more megapixels camera, a way larger camera sensor which offers a much higher image and video quality and a bigger aperture for better photography and video in low-light situations.
Galaxy A52 has a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note4, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3220mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.