Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2014-09-29 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP6 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 is a bit better than Galaxy Note4, having an 83.3 score against 77.6. Galaxy S9 is a a little lighter cellphone than the Galaxy Note4, but both of them have the same thickness. The Galaxy S9 has just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note4, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S9 also has 1 GB more RAM.
Galaxy S9 counts with a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy Note4, because it has a quite better 1440 x 2960 resolution, a just a little more pixels per inch in the display and a little bit larger screen. Galaxy S9 has much more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note4, because it has more internal storage and a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 400 GB.
The Galaxy Note4 has a little better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has 3220mAh of battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S9 captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because although it has a camera in the back with a lot lower resolution and a worse 3840x2160 video resolution, it also counts with a much bigger aperture to take better low light captures and video and a bigger camera sensor which provides a better photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.