Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2014-09-29 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 515 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP6 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy Note4, with an 80.1 score against 77.6. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro construction is way newer, but extremely thicker and way heavier than Samsung Galaxy Note4. Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Note4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has 1 GB more RAM.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a slightly better display than Galaxy Note4, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have an equal 1440 x 2560 resolution, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also counts with a just a little higher quantity of pixels per inch of screen. Galaxy Note4 captures way better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a way tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and video and a tinier back camera sensor shooting worse quality videos and pictures, it also counts with a back-facing camera with way more megapixels and a much better video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a way bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because it has 32 GB more internal storage and a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note4, because it has a 40% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.