Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2014-09-29 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP6 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip has a score of 88.5, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy Note4's 77.6 general score. The Galaxy Z Flip is a noticeably newer and somewhat thinner device than Samsung Galaxy Note4, although it's also a little heavier. The Galaxy Note4 has a little sharper screen than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher 1440 x 2560px resolution and a just a bit higher display density.
The Galaxy Z Flip features a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy Note4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM memory. Galaxy Z Flip counts with much more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features just a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy Note4, because it has a 2 percent greater battery size. The Galaxy Z Flip takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because although it has a much less mega-pixels camera in the back and a lower 3840x2160 video definition, it also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting better quality photographs and a bigger aperture to take better photography and videos in low light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.