Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-09-29 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP6 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than Samsung Galaxy Note4, getting a 92.3 score against 77.6. Galaxy Z Flip 5G's design is incredibly newer and thinner than the Samsung Galaxy Note4's, but it is just a bit heavier. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy Note4, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has 5 GB more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Note4 features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit better display density and a slightly better 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note4, because although it has a way less megapixels back facing camera and a worse (4K) video quality, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to take better images and video in low-light situations and a larger sensor which gives a better image and video quality.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because it has a 2 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.