Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2014-09-29 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP6 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a little bit better than the Galaxy Note4, getting an 81.1 score against 77.6. Even though Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is newer than the Galaxy Note4, it's a little thicker and heavier. Samsung Galaxy Note4 counts with a little bit better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a higher pixel quantity per inch in the screen.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Note4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has 3 GB more RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a way bigger storage to install games and applications than Galaxy Note4, because it has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB and more internal memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro captures way better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note4, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a lot bigger sensor providing a much higher image quality, a back facing camera with much more mega pixels and a larger aperture for better captures and videos in low-light situations.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a superior battery performance than Galaxy Note4, because it has a 56 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.