Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2015-08-21 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Glass and Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has an overall score of 85.3, which is a bit better than the Galaxy Note5's 80.2 overall score. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max construction is newer, but just a bit thicker and way heavier than the Galaxy Note5. The iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1242 x 2688 pixels and a just a bit worse pixels quantity per inch of screen, it also counts with a bit larger display.
IPhone 11 Pro Max has as much storage capacity for applications and games as Samsung Galaxy Note5, both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage. The iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a better performing CPU than Galaxy Note5, because although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster), and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the iPhone 11 Pro Max also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because although it has a camera in the back with a way worse 12 mega pixels resolution and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a larger aperture and a bigger sensor which gives a better image and video quality.
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has a 32 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.