Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2015-08-21 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 has a global score of 81.9, which is a little bit better than Galaxy Note5's overall score of 80.2. Google Pixel 4's construction is noticeably newer and a little bit lighter than Galaxy Note5's, although it is just a little bit thicker. Google Pixel 4 counts with a little bit better processing power than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Note5 counts with a little bit better screen than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Galaxy Note5 also has a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a just a little greater number of pixels in each display inch. The Galaxy Note5 features a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor capturing lower quality photos and a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy Note5 also counts with a lot more megapixels back facing camera.
Google Pixel 4's storage for apps and games is very similar to the Galaxy Note5 one, they have equal internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Note5 counts with a little longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 7 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.