Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2015-08-21 | -- |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| 6.03 ounces | -- |
| Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl | -- |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2480 x 220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 6.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | -- |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) is a little bit better than the Galaxy Note5, having a general score of 82.2 against 80.2. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored)'s design is incredibly lighter and way thinner than Galaxy Note5. Galaxy Note5 has a much more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has 12 GB less RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Samsung Galaxy Note5 features a lot better display than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a way greater pixel quantity per inch in the display and a lot better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has more internal memory.
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has a way better battery performance than Galaxy Note5, because it has a 67% larger battery size. The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) shoots clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same video definition, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rates and a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.