Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-08-21 | 2021-06-25 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl | Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black |
| Glass and Metal | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2676 x 1236 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 440 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 17.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note5 is a bit better than the Honor 50 Pro, having a score of 80.2 against 77. Samsung Galaxy Note5's construction is just a bit thinner and a bit lighter than Honor 50 Pro, even though it was released 6 years before. Samsung Galaxy Note5 features a bit sharper screen than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a little bit better pixels density.
The Honor 50 Pro counts with a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note5, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Honor 50 Pro also has more RAM memory. Honor 50 Pro has much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note5, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Honor 50 Pro counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same video quality, the same video frame rate and a same size diafragm aperture, the Honor 50 Pro also has a much more mega pixels camera. The Honor 50 Pro has longer battery performance than Galaxy Note5, because it has a 33% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.