Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2015-08-21 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl | Black and Gray |
| Glass and Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note5 has an overall score of 80.2, which is just a bit better than the LG G7 Fit's 77 score. Samsung Galaxy Note5's body is a bit thinner than the LG G7 Fit, but it's a bit heavier and was released 3 years before. Galaxy Note5 features a bit better processing power than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Galaxy Note5 also has a greater number of cores.
The LG G7 Fit counts with a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has a quite better 1440 x 3120 resolution, a little bit bigger display and a little bit better display pixel density. LG G7 Fit counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Note5, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy Note5 shoots clearer pictures and videos than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have a back facing camera with a 16 mega pixels, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy Note5 also has a larger sensor providing a higher image quality and a larger camera aperture to take better photos in poorly lited situations.
LG G7 Fit has a battery lifetime that is very similar to the battery performance in Samsung Galaxy Note5.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.