Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2015-08-21 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl | Titan gray |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 is just a bit better than the Galaxy Note5, having a overall score of 85.4 against 80.2. LG K92's design is a lot newer than Galaxy Note5's, but it is just a little thicker and somewhat heavier. The Galaxy Note5 has a bit sharper display than LG K92, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better pixels number in each inch in the screen.
LG K92 counts with a processor that's just as good as Galaxy Note5's processor, and although the LG K92 has more RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The LG K92 takes much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the LG K92 also has a camera in the back with a lot higher resolution, a bigger aperture to capture better photography and videos in low light situations and a way bigger camera sensor which provides a much higher image and video quality.
The LG K92 counts with a much better memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG K92 has better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.