Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2015-08-21 | 2020-05-07 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl | Mirror black |
| Glass and Metal | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note5 is just a bit better than LG Q70, having an 80.2 score against 77.9. The Galaxy Note5 is an noticeably older cellphone than the LG Q70, but Samsung made it just a little thinner and lighter. Samsung Galaxy Note5 features a little bit better screen than LG Q70, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better pixels quantity per screen inch.
The Samsung Galaxy Note5 features just a little better processing power than LG Q70. They have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 4 GB RAM memory. LG Q70 features a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the LG Q70 also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG Q70 captures slightly better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because although it has a smaller camera sensor capturing worse quality videos and images, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the LG Q70 also counts with a lot more mega pixels back facing camera and a bigger aperture to take better photography and videos in low-light situations.
LG Q70 has improved battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.