Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| 2015-08-21 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl | Black and Gray |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note5, getting a general score of 81.3 against 80.2. LG V35 ThinQ's construction is incredibly newer, just a little bit thinner and a little bit lighter than the Samsung Galaxy Note5. The LG V35 ThinQ features a little more vivid display than Galaxy Note5, because it has a slightly better 1440 x 2880px resolution, a little greater quantity of pixels in each inch in the screen and a quite larger screen.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note5, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note5, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with just a little better battery performance than Galaxy Note5, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity. The LG V35 ThinQ and Galaxy Note5 count with quite similar cameras, because although the LG V35 ThinQ has a smaller back-facing camera sensor taking lower quality photographs and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the same video frame rates and the same resolution back camera, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better images and video in low-light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.